What should the design temperatures be for our retrofit, taking climate change into consideration?
It seems unlikely that humanity will keep global warming below 3 degrees, given the lack of incentive for the majority to compromise their present convenience, comfort and short-term economic position to reduce the risk to the planet and to ensure the safety of future generations. So it seems that I need to use a summer cooling design temperature of 35 degrees or more when planning our UK retrofithttps://www.metoffice.gov.uk/services/insights/future-weather-forecast-for-2050.
There is also a significant risk, for the UK, of the Gulf Stream stopping (correctly the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Current (AMOC), which drives the Gulf Stream), before long. If it doesnât stop, then that 35 degree Celsius cooling design temperature applies. If it does stop, then our winter temperatures will drop by 12 degrees or so, so we need to use a design temperature of around -16 https://www.carbonbrief.org/ocean-current-collapse-could-trigger-profound-cooling-in-northern-europe-even-with-global-warming/. (In that case, there will be no summer cooling need, of course).
We could cover both possible scenarios by insulating to a high level. So should we be asking our retrofit designer to design to whichever of these two scenarios results in the greater level of insulation requirement and heat pump energy supply?
With that potential cooling need in mind, I imagine any retrofit designer we employ is likely to recommend that we give up our planned idea of a government grant under the Boiler Upgrade Scheme (BUS) for an air-to-water heat pump, and will recommend instead an air to air heat pump (or pumps), which can provide cooling in summer (as well as winter heating) in the event of no AMOC collapse (or in the mean time until it happens)? If so, is s/he likely to suggest a heat-pump water heater, for our hot water (DHW), which, after all, an air-to-air system cannot supply, I wonder?
Am I over-thinking resilience in the face of climate change? We donât really want to find that we need to upgrade an inadequate retrofit in 30 years time, however, given its likely cost, and given that we hope we are in our âforever houseâ now.